Integrating Microfinance with Education
The integration of non-financial services, such as health education and lifeskills training, with microfinance is a powerful tool in the fight against chronic hunger. Three ways of accomplishing this integration include:
Credit with Education
The third option is to fully integrate financial and non-financial service delivery.
The same staff of the same organization provides multiple services to the same
clientele. In the case of health, credit officers would also provide health
education services to their village bank clients.
This Credit with Education model reduces costs of delivering two or
more different services, since it only requires one set of staff members to
provide two different services. Also, most or all of the costs can be covered
by revenues from credit operations, since the staff are already in the field
to provide support for village banks (in effect, credit operations are cross-subsidizing
the additional service(s)). However, in fully-integrated programs, field staff
must learn to wear multiple hats and perform services that, at times, require
different sets of skills. Also, the scope of the services is mostly limited
to education and facilitation activities that can occur during a weekly village
bank meeting. In the health services example, it is possible for loan officers
to deliver a health education curriculum, but they probably would not be able
to provide health care.
Credit with Education is the best-known example of the credit-and-education
model of integration. It combines microfinance services and health,
nutrition, and business education into a single service for women in poor, rural
areas of the developing world. This type of integration of group-based poverty
lending and nonformal adult education has been reaching marginalized families
and communities around the world for more than a decade.
Linked
Services can be provided by two independent organizations, if good-quality financial
and non-financial service providers are operating in the same service area (actually
or potentially) and are willing and able to serve the same clients. In this
linked services model, the financial service provider does not directly provide
non-financial services; it partners with a non-financial service provider.
In the provision of health services, for example, a financial services organization
may form a strategic alliance with a local health clinic and allow health care
professionals to participate in the regular group meetings to attend to the
health needs of group members and their families.
This linked services model is particularly appropriate when the expertise or
infrastructure required to deliver the non-financial service is quite different
from that needed for financial services. A potential disadvantage of linkage
is that the microfinance institution (MFI) does not have control over the quality
of the partner's services. Tension also may arise as each organization competes
for the time and attention of the clients.
Parallel
A more integrated approach is the delivery of parallel services by
two programs of the same organization. An organization committed to providing
multiple services could create two distinct programs with separate, specialized
personnel who share the same organizational name and, perhaps, the same physical
and administrative infrastructure. Using the example of health services again,
an organization might elect to run parallel programs employing specialized health
educators and care providers to offer health services to their clients while
employing separate banking staff for financial services.
This parallel services model has a clear division of staff functions, yet quality
control is in the hands of the single overarching organization. This model places
a larger financial and management burden on the organization than either the
linked services model or the Credit with Education service model. There
is also some risk of duplicating services that may already be present in the
area.
Read more about Freedom from Hunger's Worldwide Programs
|